If you think that the enslavement and selling of black people from Africa was just an event propagated by white Europeans and American colonists in the 18th and 19th centuries, you’re in for a very rude awakening. Most liberals are burying their heads in the sand to ignore the blossoming slave trade that’s seeing a resurgence here in the 21st century.
The story, of course, doesn’t fit with their “all white people are evil” narrative — especially when you take a closer look at the person who made this all possible. Yep… that person is none other than their chosen one, Barack Hussein Obama.
Is it conceivable that Obama condones the enslavement of his racial brethren that’s taking place currently in Africa? Could it be that Obama’s conscious foreign policy decisions resulted in the indenturing of Africans? Could the same President who propounded the virtue of being ‘my brother’s keeper’ be the same person who has ignored the plight of his brother Malik?
The answer to all of these questions, according to FrontPage Mag, is ‘Yes’.
Obama is an amalgamation and personification of liberal identity groups, with his Muslim identity being prima inter pares; the sense of Muslim cultural superiority trumping the outrage of black supremacy…but not by much.
The first Black president, not counting Bill Clinton of course, was no friend to Sub Saharan Africa.
“Unlike President Bush, Obama paid little attention to Africa,” writes FrontPage, “When he did pay attention to Africa, it was largely to reward Muslim violence against African Christians in Nigeria, Kenya or Côte d’Ivoire. And, most prominently, Libya.”
With the ‘Arab Spring’ sweeping North Africa, the Obama White House eagerly followed the advice of Hillary Clinton’s State Department to back jihadists willing to topple Libyan dictator Muammar Gadaffi in 2011.
Wrapped in the pretense of ‘the pursuit of freedom’, the Arab Spring was a Trojan Horse for the rapid spread of Islamic jihad.
“Obama’s Arab Spring encouraged Islamist movements in their bids for power whether they used ballots or bullets,” reports FrontPage, “The resulting devastation in the Middle East, with its death toll in the hundreds of thousands, and the rise of ISIS, has captured the world’s attention. But the Islamist wave spread chaos and terror through Africa. Egypt and Tunisia fell into the hands of Islamist killers who brutalized their own people even as the media cheered these ‘democratic revolutions’.
Following the end of Gadaffi, the same Muslim militias used by Obama and Hillary to carry out the chaos resorted to the Muslim practice of gathering slaves, who just happened to have a large population of Sub-Saharan African migrant workers at their disposal.
Historically, Islam was a larger slave trader than Europeans ever were and this has to do with the Quran’s greenlighting of slavery. Obama, ever the devout Muslim, abides by Volume 3, Book 34, Number 351 of the Sahih Bukhari which states:
“A man decided that a slave of his would be manumitted after his death and later on he was in need of money, so the Prophet took the slave and said, ‘Who will buy this slave from me?’ Nu’aim bin ‘Abdullah bought him for such and such price and the Prophet gave him the slave.’”
Such unconcern for fellow Africans should not surprise anyone. Obama did not lift one finger to help his brother Malik who fell on hard times. The result? Malik has seen through Obama’s lies and is an avid Trump supporter.
The fact that a Black American has thrown away the lives of thousands of Africans to fund Islamic slavery should be global front page news.
What is your reaction?